As we move deeper into 2025, a resurgence of interest in historical materialism—the Marxist framework that interprets history through the lens of material conditions and class struggle—is poised to take hold. This revival is not a random intellectual trend but a response to the converging crises of our time: economic inequality, technological upheaval, environmental collapse, and a growing disillusionment with neoliberal promises. Here’s why historical materialism is likely to gain traction this year and beyond.

1. The Escalating Crisis of Capitalism

The past decade has seen wealth inequality reach staggering levels, with the top 1% amassing unprecedented fortunes while wages stagnate for the working class. In 2025, this disparity is no longer an abstract statistic but a lived reality for millions facing rising costs of living, housing unaffordability, and precarious gig work. Historical materialism offers a compelling explanation: it argues that such inequalities are not anomalies but inevitable outcomes of a capitalist system driven by profit and exploitation. As people search for answers beyond the tired rhetoric of "hard work pays off," this framework’s focus on systemic forces over individual merit resonates.

2. Technological Disruption and Labor

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and automation in 2025 is transforming the labor market at an unprecedented pace. While tech optimists herald a new era of productivity, millions of workers face job displacement without a clear safety net. Historical materialism provides a lens to understand this shift as a continuation of capital’s drive to reduce labor costs and consolidate power. By framing technology not as a neutral force but as a tool shaped by class interests, it offers a critique that aligns with the anxieties of those left behind in the digital economy.

3. Climate Change as a Class Issue

The environmental crisis is reaching a tipping point in 2025, with extreme weather events and resource scarcity disproportionately affecting the world’s poorest communities. Historical materialism’s emphasis on how economic systems shape human interaction with nature is finding new relevance. It posits that capitalism’s relentless pursuit of growth and profit is the root cause of ecological devastation, a perspective gaining traction among activists and thinkers who see greenwashing and market-based solutions failing to address the scale of the problem. As climate justice movements grow, this materialist critique ties environmental struggles to class struggle, broadening its appeal.

4. Disillusionment with Ideological Alternatives

Liberalism’s promise of incremental progress has faltered, and populist nationalism, while still potent, is proving incoherent in addressing global challenges. In this vacuum, historical materialism offers a robust alternative: a grand narrative that connects past, present, and future through the dynamics of production and power. Its rejection of idealism—favoring concrete economic realities over abstract values—appeals to a generation skeptical of empty platitudes and hungry for structural analysis. In 2025, as trust in institutions continues to erode, this approach feels less like a relic of the 19th century and more like a tool for decoding the chaos of the 21st.

5. A New Wave of Intellectual and Cultural Engagement

The resurgence of historical materialism isn’t just theoretical—it’s cultural. In 2025, we’re seeing a proliferation of books, podcasts, and online discussions revisiting Marxist ideas, often tailored to contemporary issues like digital monopolies and global supply chains. Younger generations, radicalized by economic precarity and climate dread, are driving this shift, finding in historical materialism a framework that validates their experiences and offers a roadmap for change. Its dialectical method—emphasizing contradiction and transformation—mirrors the volatility of the moment, making it a natural fit for a world in flux.

Challenges to Its Rise

Of course, historical materialism won’t sweep the globe unchallenged. Its association with failed 20th-century experiments like the Soviet Union remains a hurdle, and its dense terminology can alienate casual observers. Yet, in 2025, a new generation of thinkers is reframing it, stripping away dogma and applying it flexibly to modern conditions. The focus is less on predicting utopia and more on diagnosing the present—a shift that could broaden its appeal.

Conclusion

Historical materialism’s resurgence in 2025 reflects a collective yearning for explanations that match the scale of today’s crises. By rooting history in the material—land, labor, and capital—it offers clarity where other ideologies falter. Whether it leads to revolutionary change or simply reshapes public discourse, its growing popularity signals a turning point: a recognition that the past holds lessons for navigating an increasingly unstable future. As the contradictions of capitalism sharpen, historical materialism stands ready to meet the moment.

‍